“Monarchy is over in Nepal”. The same title is being used in fashionable ways by many media in this world—of course, only those who hold significant stake in Nepal. The biggest stake holder and the director of Nepal’s devastation is Nepal’s closest and sadistic neighbor, India. Even though the intellectuals are familiar with this direction, I would like to show why the world remains anonymous of this India’s sponsorship of terrorism in Nepal. Quite surprisingly, the actors have created a huge mass of junior actors in the hope to make them a lead actor one day. In the mean time, the director is enjoying the show. Let’s trace back when the director thought to direct this inhuman movie that might not leave the director an option of bankruptcy if the truth is exposed.

As known to the world, Nepal was a Kingdom and the most peaceful country in this chaotic earth. While many may disagree, however, there was no extreme poverty in Nepal in mid 20^th century. The Indo-Nepal friction started when the then Prime Minister of Nepal—Jung Bahaur Rana—supported the British India to suppress the Sepoy Rebellion. In 1857, India could have born, but since the Rana prime ministers of Nepal were strong allies of British, they supported British in their mission to crush any independence revolution. In fact, Nepal had already become an enemy of Indians then. Moreover, the strength of Gurkha army was the biggest obstacle for the Indians to overcome. Because of Rana’s support for British India, the later known India could not gain independence until 1947. Many of us forget to note, immediately after India was born, the Rana Empire was thrown out in Nepal in the year 1950. The then Prime Minster of Nepal—Mohan Shumsher Rana—was deposed who would later go to India on a self imposed exile. His titular successor—Pashupati Shumsher Rana—still resides in Nepal. His role would come into play post the Royal Massacre of 2001. Until 1950, Ranas were the prime rulers of Nepal and the monarchy was only symbolic. When India was born in 1947, the then prime minister of India was Jawarharlal Nehru—the same leader who kicked out Indira Nehru for marrying a Muslim, who would later become India Gandhi and the biggest enemy of Hindus and Sikhs.

There was another family who was fighting for the Indian state with the Indians—the Koiralas. Koiralas were Indians who were born in the Northern Province of British India –modern day of Bihar or Uttar Pradesh in India. Koiralas were three brothers who were born and raised in India. The family claims to be originally from Nepal, however, their roots and bushes have been found only in India. Even today, much of Koirala family resides in India—respecting the motherland. The Koirala brothers joined struggled to give birth to India. During the later years when India was about to born, Koiralas were suggested to form Nepal Congress Party within India. Finally India was born in 1947 with another new nation—Pakistan. Appropriate justice does not seem to be carried out looking at the area of India and Pakistan and the number of people residing. The most important factor was religion. Most of the princely states were to join the Union of India. One of the biggest Kingdoms was the Kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir whose King Raja Hari Singh was a Hindu and the population majority was of Muslim. Raja Hari Singh decided not to surrender his Kingdom to either of the countries. However, illegally, India annexed the Kingdom into its Union. It is interesting to see how Indian text books claim this beautiful Kingdom a part of India. In the last days of 1948, a ceasefire was agreed under UN auspices demanding plebiscite. Nehru never proceeded with the UN resolution and hence, the ascertainity of the instrument of accession is questionable. The Kingdom—as falsely claimed by India and Pakistan—is still considered as the international disputed territory. Then India annexed the Kingdom of Gwalior, and the Kingdom of Hyderabad. By all means, they were illegal annexation. India’s vulture eyes were gazing the Kingdom of Sikkim and the Kingdom of Nepal. The Indian Congress had helped create Nepali congress for a good reason. The Indians had foreseen their fortune in Nepal. The Koiralas were assured by the Indians that they would help Nepal merge into India if the Indians help throw the Rana regime in Nepal. India was lured with this Childish Koirala Deal. Even a newborn child would see the benefit in helping the needy brothers. Finally, in 1950, King Tribhuwan fled to India to seek refuge from the Ranas. The only Royal member left was the 3 year old, the then prince Gyanendra. The Ranas—who were expert in analyzing the future—were familiar with the Indian game. The Indians had thought to end the monarchy in 1950, but the Ranas, moving a mile ahead, crowned the 3 year old as the King of the Kingdom of Nepal. The Koiralas’ and the Indians’ dream shattered. The Ranas knew that India wanted to weaken Nepal by overthrowing monarchy. Hence, they took the wisest step to save Nepal, and we witnessed the result. Even though the Ranas were able to save Nepal’s monarchy, unfortunately, their Empire was brought down. Since Ranas were the true Nationalists, their downfall encouraged India to envision a possibility to annexing Nepal into India.

Not that easy as the Indians had presumed. The King in Nepal was considered the reincarnation of Hindu God, and replacing the intuition of Monarchy was their far dream. They figured where the problem laid—Monarchy. Nevertheless, India did not stay quiet, and offered Sikkim and Nepal to sign the instrument of accession and join the Union of India Nepal’s the then King Mahendra got infuriated with the proposal, whereas the “Koirala equivalent” prime Minister of Sikkim offered Sikkim in the hands of India, only to be slaughtered. The three Koirala brothers became the prime ministers of Nepal on the recommendation and pressure from India. This paved an easy path for the Indians to observe Nepal more closely. Nepal’s monarchy was well aware of this Indian strategy, however, the then King Birendra had declared Nepal as the Zone of Peace in the 90s. This was endorsed by more than 110 countries of the world, except India. Intellectuals could smell the stink that was coming from the southern block. King Birendra’s popularity almost made India’s dream a nightmare. Moreover, the future King Dipendra was one of the most popular figures of Nepalese monarchy in the history.

India’s dream was almost impossible. As the Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi created LTTE in Sri Lanka, they thought to help launch a Maoist revolution in Nepal to break Nepal. The Maoists’ top demand was the abolition of Monarchy. Since the year 1996, India started funding Nepal Maoists to fight against state. As the Maoist party was formed in 1996, their leaders were backed up by the Indian government. Most of the Maoists leader lived in Darjeeling, Lucknow, and Delhi in India and masterminded their plan. These plans were executed by guerrilla who lived in Nepal and were dying to fight war. In other words, India created Communism in Nepal. They also were supported by the Indian Communist leaders and other Naxalite group who are fighting against the Indian government for communism. Surprisingly India never helped Nepal government in arresting those leaders and extraditing them in Nepal. When Nepali Maoists met Nepali Communist leaders in Lucknow, India in 2003, India government did not take initiative to arrest them, even though they were recognized as terrorists by the United States. Hence it is evident that India never wanted peace in Nepal. At the same time, international media was busy defaming the King Gyanendra.

The interesting chemistry was all political parties held discussions in India with the Maoists in the Indian’s presence. The irony was Maoists were able to kill Inspector General of Police of the Royal Nepalese Government, but were not able to kill any leaders. This does not digest well. These Maoists and leaders were in agreement not to kill each others leaders. Although India was successful in proving why they did not endorse “Zone of Peace”, they were unable to offer prayers to King. Then India played the worst game with the help of its own citizens—Koiralas, and Maoists to end the Nepalese monarchy—which the world today knows as the Nepal’s Royal Massacre.

After the Royal Massacre, many speculations were in the air. However, immediately after the incident, media, which are funded by India, started to air against Gyanendra, who was the only heir left to the throne. India’s, Koirala’s and Maoists’ strategy was to defame monarchy and most importantly, the monarch who was unknown to the world. India knew that King Birendra was most popular and if the blame could be dumped on Gyanendra, it would be the easiest way to uproot monarchy. And so was the story we witnessed. India had a sound plan to kill the Royal Family so that no one else would remain alive to keep the monarchy breathing. However, the massacre happened when King Gyanendra was out of town and allegedly was on the way back to the massacre site for the dinner. Gyanendra was crowned again as the King of Nepal, and India, once again, could not prove to be a successful director. India funded media were airing speculations about King Gyanendra. The love and respect for the King was then seen by the shaved head of all the Nepalese—who respected Nepalese Monarch as their father. Noticeably, the present Prime Minster, Girija Prasad, the same Indian Citizen, was the Prime Minister of Nepal during the Royal Massacre. He helped India facilitate the killings. Later, he also facilitated King Gyanendra, to be removed from the palace. In other words, the Koiralas were well aware of the killings, but instead of stopping India to kill the royals, the old traitor helped them successfully execute the plan.

The King wanted the then prime minister Sher Bahadur Deuba to hold the elections but even after he was granted to extend the date of election twice, he was never motivated to hold the election. The underlying political reason was that he continuously wanted to be in his office by postponing the election. As a Chief of State, King Gyanendra could not wait to see his country devastated. This made him to sack the cabinet and impose his direct rule. Subsequently, in October 2002, King Gyanendra dismissed the prime minister and his cabinet. While stopping short of reestablishing parliament, the king in June 2004 reinstated the most recently elected prime minister who formed a four-party coalition government. The King, citing dissatisfaction with the government, dissolved the government in 2005, declared a state of emergency, imprisoned party leaders, and assumed power. The king's government subsequently released party leaders and officially ended the state of emergency in May 2005, but the monarch retained absolute power until April 2006.

When King Gyanendra ascended throne in 2002, Nepal has been going through civil war from the past ten years. Politicians of Nepal, as an easy excuse to take benefit from inexperienced King imposed blame on him. When King sacked the parliament for its inability to hold elections, the law was enforced, the administration was healthy and the environment was getting conducive. He acted tough on the people to enforce laws. The 12 years of democracy by then had made Nepalese lazy and incompetent, but the king wanted to abolish the ongoing crisis. While most of Nepalese were pleased to see this progress, the corrupted people were unemployed. The leaders of Nepal are barely educated to find a job, if they do not engage themselves into politics. The government employees who never showed up on time were forced to be in the office and corruption was strictly made illegal. How can idle Nepalese like that? Obviously it will make them revolt. These led the politicians ally together and form a coalition to fight against the King. Nepal and Indian media supported well these coalition leaders. Countable 10-15 people gathered for to restore democracy and started protest. It was not until April 2006, when Maoists joined the movement to fight against king. Truckload Maoists entered the capital city to revolt. As a way to spread violence, Maoists attacked on Maoists in the revolution process and charged King for their deaths. After 30 people were killed, the King gave up all the powers and reinstated the government. Hence, the King who wanted to make the country progress was iconized as a dictator. Following that, if anyone in Nepal supports nationalism, then they are labeled as royalists or a dictator.

Now that the monarchy is gone, common Nepalese who are die hard fans of King, are looking for their God. However, Hinduism and Buddism have not taught violence to Nepalese. Maybe that’s why common Nepalese are not on the streets yet. I remain unanswered, is Hinduism’s patience tested? Is Gurkhas’ blood tested? Are the Nepalese tested? Nepal has so far witnessed the Maoists crowd, not the Nepali crowd, there will be a day when Gurkhalis will be on the streets to show the bravery of Amar Singh Thapa, Bir Balbhadra Kunwar, Bhimsen Thapa, or another Jung Bahadur Rana…and who knows, another Prithvi Narayan Shah to Unify the breaking Nepal.

http://newsblaze.com/story/20080619175135tsop.nb/topstory.html

Interesting Article. What's is your source for this writing?

Very interesting article... I hope that day will come soon to unify Nepal once again.

This is true...... I do not think he needs souce for this article.... every thing indicated here are the historical facts and if analyzed properly we get a clear picture of India playing a dirty politics on Nepal with their incompetent agents-corrupt ppolitical leaders.

I guess this is true.

Well written.

Girija and Prachanda are both agents of India.

 

Very ture!

Nice fiction enjoyed thoroughly, though just read few paragraphs and was enough.

Mana ko laddu ghiu sanga khaanu. Katha ramailo chha, kasko paisa khaayera dakaareko spashta chha.

A very well written article, but I’m not buying the arguments.

yesto JPT analysis garera lekhera time khera falnu satta AND yesto JPT padera time falnu bhanda bary joke padera base huncha, yo joke bhanda teo funny joke padda at least haso ta uuthcha.

Koirala are indians and congress is made to merge nepal to india, WTF. As Maverick said, 3 paragraphs is what I read and they were sufficient to imagine what the remaining article is about.

Best of luck for your campaing. But I will always oppose the hidden motive behind this type of article.

Awesome argument. Some of the points are true of the 1950 's . But then still blaming India for everything in Nepal is wrong . Affnai ghar kamjor bhaye pachi  hamile affailai dosh dinu parcha .
We the citizens of nepal , and its our responsibility where we take this country towards . Rather than blaming the politicians , i think we should blame ourself for not using out vote correctly . We have given power to everyone , lets try the maoist too . I an't no maoist supporter .But then in democracy , the number of votes count .
I am a pro monarch , and i feel bad for the way His majesty has been treated .

" jai desh jai naresh " .....ALWAYS

Exactly,, all the blame to India. If king was so much in love for the country then where is that shown? Did he worked towards the benefit of peopel when he was given a chance? Gosh...people still worshipping him need to wake up now..

When will these propaganda and proapagandist stop, its no fun reading someone else's story. Why doesn't people just see the fact and try to patch up things. Why play hate-politics? Why koirala, king or whoever is in power being blamed for some big master plan when the matter of fact is none of them were smart enough. Prachanda Baburam are successful(only temporarily) because they played this propaganga game. They would change their analysis every other day and define them as the truth. They gave their life for this hate politics. Now everyone thinks king is innocent because he was. Because now its open. Everyone is open. I would rather fear dog of narayanhiti than gyanendra. If it was him who killed birendra one of those who were inside must have opened up, the doctors as he said, or someone. At least one freaking guy. But noone can tell anything because nothing had happened inside those walls, except for the sociopath going on a killing rampage.

People try to find out pattern out of the random foolish acts of koirala, dipendra, gyanendra, prachanda and try to interconnect them. But they always have failed.

Koirala is foolish because he thinks party belongs to his brother and koirala should be throned in congress
Gyanendra is foolish because he tried to mend the country in his own foolish way, bringing old nepalese monkeys from all around the world
Prachanda has been going great so far, but i dont like him because he distributed fake dreams, killed people, manipulated rest of them to hate the rest of the nation so much that they gave life for it
Makune is foolish because he never did any politics, just stay there and gave some talks gave some foolish politics and now everyone gave him his deserving place

Rest of the polliticians they are foolish because they couldn't dethrone those foolish guys from the top and take control of the party

This is truth, why go as far as Rajeev Gandhi Nehru and all those. Those days are gone. China may play those secret games with America or America with China, India might play games with China, or China with India but Nepal might be of less concern of everyone. At least till now, noone is eyeing Nepal.

This post is getting long, I will try to cut thing short. Please hate propaganda and focus on developing our country by being rich nepalese in united states, united kingdom or someplace else. These are the only places where nepalese are doing good.

Yep,  i agree with you . India is sponsoring the terrorists to destabilize Nepal. This is 100% true, n there is no doubt. And these leaders are the agents who r always behind money n power. See that Makune, the indian embassy provided full scholarship to his daughter for medical study in india, he never speak against India.  So, how can Nepal go ahead??????

Have you guys play the game "Ludo"?      its same happening in Nepal now.

however, God Bless us even though he is crippled.

i buy it.....seems like they have been getting what they want and unfortunately most of us dont have any more to say against it.politics is controlled n so is the media.

Good Writing.

The writing proves that Gyanendra was as incompetent as his forefathers.

If i was Gyanendra, i would have donated some of Birendra's property into schools and country, jailed few corrupt politicians and confiscate their properties and turn them into schools and hospitals as well to earn goodwill. Of all the Shah kings Gyanendra has to be the dumbest one because he had a perfect oppurtunity to establish his dictatorship and still couldnt.

Nepali people were already tired of continious bullshit by political parties and the King had best oppurtunity to get the country back in his grip.

If he had let go few of Birendra's property and had not worried about changing all the national property under his name within few days of gripping the power after all within a year or two...he could have all those property he wanted under his name anyways.

From time to time Shah dynasty has proven their incompetence, the murders, rape, sex scandles and the trend of marring their own relatives(inbreeding) explains they were doomed for extinction.

Good article....most of it is true...looking at it now..i think KG is a ppl loving person..he gave up his powers for the sake of the nation and ppl....and he gave up easily...during his regime the politicians were playing dirty games of selfishness and corruption....everybody wanted to be a PM...they were after the power ....they never cared bout the ppl....and even after the king is gone they are still playing the game of power sharing.....this will continue forever...they are not made for us and nation....a government will be formed and will be brought down...this will continue for years ......a day will come when nepalese ( not congress,maoist,communist etc) but true nepalese will demand their rights from these corrupted leaders and kick them out....long live our nation....

Nepal the next sikkim..............thats where it is heading for..............

FU** you politicians.................

nice story......................hahhahahah............................but yeah bro!!!!that is absolutely true.....girrrii...jaaa,bp..jaaa....etc are fu###in  dic###khead......an indian agent........................................................man !!!!!!!!what is that greedy vulture still doin with that PM post??? i think that he's gonna take it with him to...hell...........DAMN YOU!!!!!!!! GIRI....jjjaaaaaaaaaaa.....that mofo SUCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS.............HE is a    DHABBBBBAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA............... 

Sick with the so called "intellects" rhetoric of quit blaming India for everything! Hello?? Are you people not in touch with reality or what? How do you explain the new Indian ambassador hold meetings with Prachanda 12 times already since his appointment 3 months ago. That's about once a week! Where else in the world do we see this kind of crap?? How about Nepali ambassador meeting with other Indian top leaders?

 

Anyways to cut the long story short…or you can read the above article in its entritiy if you want the longer version! India will not let us live in peace or die with dignity until and unless we become the next Sikkim or at the very least the next Bhutan. So, become Sikkim and forever lose your national identity or become Bhutan and then get kicked out like the ethnics Nepalis (in the case of Nepal the kicking will come from the likes of Upendra Yadav and alike)