[VIEWED 13045
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
Sarala
Please log in to subscribe to Sarala's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 7:35
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Dear Sajhaities, I hope here are some mathmatician. One of my friends asked me one question that it is true: 2+2 = 22 Could someone explain me how is it true?
|
|
|
|
Sarala
Please log in to subscribe to Sarala's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 7:46
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Also she said that it may be in binary or other numbering system.
|
|
|
palpali gaule
Please log in to subscribe to palpali gaule's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 8:34
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
perhaps it is a simple matter of visual mathematics 1+1=11 2+2=22 3+3=33 4+4=44 i think you get the point.....
|
|
|
nO_wAy
Please log in to subscribe to nO_wAy's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 8:53
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
dear sarala ji Ur fren is STUPID no offence Pease Out
|
|
|
Cecil
Please log in to subscribe to Cecil's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 9:40
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
even in binary: 0010 = 2 + 0010 = 2 --------- 0100 = 4 not sure how your friend does it. She might have some other method. Like to see that. But should make sense though. There is no such thing called "fuzzy math".
|
|
|
solver
Please log in to subscribe to solver's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 10:05
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
guys u can get 2+2 is 22 if u dont typecast the values provided in VB textboxes. VB Programmer understand what I mean.
|
|
|
highfly
Please log in to subscribe to highfly's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 10:07
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
i do not know about math but its about the mgmt theory. Synegy: defined as 1 + 1 = 11 Value of team work Peace out
|
|
|
freek
Please log in to subscribe to freek's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 11:02
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
HERE IS FUNNY ANSWER 0010 = 2 0010 0010 == 22( in binary ) 2+2=22 but who ever ask this she is STUPID
|
|
|
Pokharelikanchha
Please log in to subscribe to Pokharelikanchha's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 2:14
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Hi Freek you are wrong even in binary 10110 = 22 0000=0 0001=1 0010=2 0011=3 0100=4 0101=5 0110=6 0111=7 1000=8 1001=9 1010=10 1011=11 1100=12 1101=13 1110=14 1111=15 10000=16 10001=17 10010=18 10011=19 10100=20 10101=21 10110=22
|
|
|
From Kiwiland
Please log in to subscribe to From Kiwiland's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 5:19
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Problem : 2+2 = 22 Liberty : Solve by binary or other numbering system. Taking advantage of "any other numbering system" defined in the query,I proceed as There are numerous system except binary. we can as well define a system ... a coding system and can prove this. I have come across 2 ways of solving this problem. 1. 2 in binary = 00010 so 00010 + 00010 ---------------- 10110 ( which is 22) Considering a coding scheme in which 0 + 0 = 0 or 1 (which toggles each time) and 1 + 1 = 1 or 0 ( which toggles each time) 2. Anyone with some knowledge of binary system may well know Gray codes.( that goes like 0, 1 , 11 , 10 , 110. toggling) Lets define new gray code - name it kiwigray code.. where instead of starting from 0, 1 , 11, 10.. we start the code with 00000 as 0 00100 as 1 00110 as 2 00010 as 3.. proceding this way we can end up having 01100 as 22. thus 00100(2) + 00100 (2) = 01100 (22) QED :) cheers!
|
|
|
From Kiwiland
Please log in to subscribe to From Kiwiland's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 5:22
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
tYPO thus 00110(2) + 00110 (2) = 01100 (22) ( AS DEFINED ABOVE) QED :) cheers
|
|
|
nO_wAy
Please log in to subscribe to nO_wAy's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 6:40
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Maannn, m confussed Actually, i dont hav much ideas 'bout binary. i guess thatz the reason. Anywayz, From_kiwiland, u the MAN. (genious) i gues from ur solution, itz true that 2+2= 22 Mr. Genious Prove: (-1) = (+1) Waitin for......................... Pease OuT :`~)
|
|
|
confused
Please log in to subscribe to confused's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 9:14
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
hahaha, ram ram ram ..this is sooo easy..read carefully what she said, "lso she said that it may be in binary or other numbering system", sooo dude, make up ur own numbering system..maybe its base 18 numbering system .. 2+2 =22 so in base 18 number system second 2 remains two whereas the first two is, how 18 time s 1 is 18 plus 2 is 20... so its 22..get it :) 2+(18^1)+ 2+(18^0) = 22 easy as that..:)
|
|
|
confused
Please log in to subscribe to confused's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 9:30
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
IGNORE THE ABOVE POST I WAS WRONG ! haha this is easierrr.....than i imagined..its on Base 10 numbering system..ITSELFFF!!!! dont even need to touch BINARY :) 2(10^1)+ 2(10^0) = 22 get it ppl :) P.S dammn aint i stupid..by the way in base 18 numbering system it wud have been 38 not 22 :)
|
|
|
RBhandari
Please log in to subscribe to RBhandari's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 9:33
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
How about solving it in unary and not in binary? In binary system, each BIT can either be 0 or 1. But imagine a number system where each UIT can have only one value, say 2. So the number sequence goes like this: nothing=0, 2=1, 22=2, 222=3, 2222=4, 22222=5, and so on. So it's apparant that 2+2=22.
|
|
|
confused
Please log in to subscribe to confused's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 9:35
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Prove: (-1) = (+1) no way, absolute value of -1 is 1 and absolute value of postive 1 is 1 .. .that is how its equal.
|
|
|
DWI
Please log in to subscribe to DWI's postings.
Posted on 10-28-04 9:43
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Confused, hamilai pani confused garidine bhanya? It won't work on base 18 or base 10. While focusing on the left hand side of the equation (2+2) how can you multiply the term by the bases? The only multiplication you are allowed to is by the base to the power 0, which is 1. The multiplication you are doing is applicable on R.H.S of the equation. *************************************** Lets see which base system this can hold true. We need, 2+2=22 Left hand side is clearly 4. We now have to find out the number system (base) whose '4' equivalent is '22.' Or 2*X^1 + 2*X^0 = (4) .......4 not represented in the base system right now. Or 2*X + 2 = 4 Or 2X = 2 or X=1 So the base is 1. This is impossible as we cannot use the number '2' in base '1' system. Therefore, equation 2+2=22 can not be true in any number system.
|
|
|
freek
Please log in to subscribe to freek's postings.
Posted on 10-29-04 2:29
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
HOLLY SHIT ITS A HEXA NOT BINARY POKH TRY NOW HERE IS FUNNY ANSWER 0010 = 2 0010 0010 == 22( in binary ) 2+2=22 but who ever ask this she is STUPID
|
|
|
From Kiwiland
Please log in to subscribe to From Kiwiland's postings.
Posted on 10-29-04 2:39
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Com'on guys! I have given 2 solutions for the problem... u guys still discussing the same thing. I dont know if u guys understood the solution. And by the way.. 2+2 = 22 ..doesn't work in any base.. so no point in trying out bases. It can only be done if u have a coding system which codes such that binary value of 2 + 2 as 22. by the way- freek..its 2 + 2 =22 .. its not that 2 2 =22 - for confused - if it would be in base 10 ( which is used in everyday life).. nobody have raised the query.... its 2 2 = 22 in base 10 considering these are two bits... but here the problem is 2+2 = 22....
|
|
|
gaalab
Please log in to subscribe to gaalab's postings.
Posted on 10-29-04 3:10
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Gaalabian Algebra It's based on trianary system (0, 1, 2) Let me explain with an example.... Let's divide the Nepalese society into three classes. When a couple get married, the person in the lower rank will take the status of higher class as well (suerely, mahila-purush barabri theory lagu hunchha) . That would mean, Middle-Class + Upper-Class = Upper-Class Upper-Class Middle-Class + Middle-Class = Middle-Class Middle-Class Upper-Class + Working Class = Upper-Class Upper-Class Let's represent Working Class, Middle Class and Upper Class as 0, 1, 2 The Gaalabian Algebra will, thus, give the following result 0 + 0 = 00 0 + 1 = 11 0 + 2 = 22 1 + 0 = 11 1 + 1 = 11 1 + 2 = 22 2 + 0 = 22 2 + 1 = 22 2 + 2 = 22
|
|