[VIEWED 132749
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
RiceOwls07
Please log in to subscribe to RiceOwls07's postings.
Posted on 06-12-08 11:56
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
4
?
Liked by
|
|
“Monarchy is over in Nepal”. The same title is being used in fashionable
ways by many media in this world—of course, only those who hold significant
stake in Nepal. The biggest stake holder and the director of Nepal’s devastation is Nepal’s closest and sadistic neighbor, India. Even though the intellectuals are familiar
with this direction, I would like to show why the world remains anonymous of
this India’s sponsorship of terrorism
in Nepal. Quite surprisingly, the actors have created a
huge mass of junior actors in the hope to make them a lead actor one day. In the mean time, the director is enjoying
the show. Let’s trace back when the
director thought to direct this inhuman movie that might not leave the director
an option of bankruptcy if the truth is exposed.
As known to the world, Nepal was a Kingdom and the most
peaceful country in this chaotic earth.
While many may disagree, however, there was no extreme poverty in Nepal in mid 20th
century. The Indo-Nepal friction started
when the then Prime Minister of Nepal—Jung
Bahaur Rana—supported the British India to
suppress the Sepoy Rebellion. In 1857, India could have born, but since the Rana prime
ministers of Nepal
were strong allies of British, they supported British in their mission to crush
any independence revolution. In fact, Nepal had
already become an enemy of Indians then.
Moreover, the strength of Gurkha army was the biggest obstacle for the Indians
to overcome. Because of Rana’s support
for British India, the later known India could not gain independence
until 1947. Many of us forget to note,
immediately after India was
born, the Rana Empire was thrown out in Nepal in the year 1950. The then Prime Minster of Nepal—Mohan Shumsher Rana—was deposed who would
later go to India
on a self imposed exile. His titular
successor—Pashupati Shumsher Rana—still resides in Nepal. His role would come into play post the Royal
Massacre of 2001. Until 1950, Ranas were
the prime rulers of Nepal
and the monarchy was only symbolic. When
India was born in 1947, the
then prime minister of India
was Jawarharlal Nehru—the same leader who kicked out Indira Nehru for marrying
a Muslim, who would later become India Gandhi and the biggest enemy of Hindus
and Sikhs.
There was another family who was fighting for the
Indian state with the Indians—the Koiralas.
Koiralas were Indians who were born in the Northern Province of British
India –modern day of Bihar or Uttar Pradesh in India. Koiralas were three brothers who were born
and raised in India. The family claims to be originally from Nepal, however, their roots and bushes have been
found only in India. Even today, much of Koirala family resides in
India—respecting
the motherland. The Koirala brothers
joined struggled to give birth to India. During the later years when India was about to born, Koiralas were suggested
to form Nepal Congress Party within India. Finally India
was born in 1947 with another new nation—Pakistan. Appropriate justice does not seem to be
carried out looking at the area of India
and Pakistan
and the number of people residing. The
most important factor was religion. Most
of the princely states were to join the Union of India. One of the biggest Kingdoms was the Kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir whose King Raja Hari
Singh was a Hindu and the population majority was of Muslim. Raja Hari Singh decided not to surrender his
Kingdom to either of the countries.
However, illegally, India
annexed the Kingdom into its Union. It is interesting to see how Indian text
books claim this beautiful Kingdom a part of India. In the last days of 1948, a
ceasefire was agreed under UN auspices demanding plebiscite. Nehru never proceeded with the UN resolution
and hence, the ascertainity of the instrument of accession is questionable. The
Kingdom—as falsely claimed by India
and Pakistan—is
still considered as the international disputed territory. Then India
annexed the Kingdom of Gwalior, and the Kingdom of Hyderabad. By all means, they were illegal annexation. India’s
vulture eyes were gazing the Kingdom
of Sikkim and the Kingdom of Nepal. The Indian Congress had helped create Nepali
congress for a good reason. The Indians
had foreseen their fortune in Nepal. The Koiralas were assured by the Indians that
they would help Nepal merge
into India if the Indians
help throw the Rana regime in Nepal. India was lured with this Childish
Koirala Deal. Even a newborn child would
see the benefit in helping the needy brothers.
Finally, in 1950, King Tribhuwan fled to India to seek refuge from the
Ranas. The only Royal member left was
the 3 year old, the then prince Gyanendra.
The Ranas—who were expert in analyzing the future—were familiar with the
Indian game. The Indians had thought to
end the monarchy in 1950, but the Ranas, moving a mile ahead, crowned the 3
year old as the King of the Kingdom
of Nepal. The Koiralas’ and the Indians’ dream
shattered. The Ranas knew that India wanted to weaken Nepal by
overthrowing monarchy. Hence, they took
the wisest step to save Nepal,
and we witnessed the result. Even though
the Ranas were able to save Nepal’s
monarchy, unfortunately, their Empire was brought down. Since Ranas were the true Nationalists, their
downfall encouraged India to
envision a possibility to annexing Nepal
into India.
Not that easy as the Indians had presumed. The King in Nepal was considered the
reincarnation of Hindu God, and replacing the intuition of Monarchy was their
far dream. They figured where the
problem laid—Monarchy. Nevertheless, India
did not stay quiet, and offered Sikkim and Nepal to sign the instrument of
accession and join the Union of India
Nepal’s the then King Mahendra got infuriated with the proposal, whereas
the “Koirala equivalent” prime Minister of Sikkim offered Sikkim in the hands
of India, only to be slaughtered. The
three Koirala brothers became the prime ministers of Nepal
on the recommendation and pressure from India. This paved an easy path for the Indians to
observe Nepal
more closely. Nepal’s
monarchy was well aware of this Indian strategy, however, the then King Birendra
had declared Nepal
as the Zone of Peace in the 90s. This
was endorsed by more than 110 countries of the world, except India. Intellectuals could smell the stink that was
coming from the southern block. King
Birendra’s popularity almost made India’s dream a nightmare. Moreover, the future King Dipendra was one of
the most popular figures of Nepalese monarchy in the history.
India’s dream was almost impossible. As the Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi created
LTTE in Sri Lanka, they
thought to help launch a Maoist revolution in Nepal
to break Nepal. The Maoists’ top demand was the abolition of
Monarchy. Since the year 1996, India started
funding Nepal Maoists to fight against state.
As the Maoist party was formed in 1996, their leaders were backed up by
the Indian government. Most of the Maoists leader lived in Darjeeling,
Lucknow, and Delhi
in India
and masterminded their plan. These plans were executed by guerrilla who lived
in Nepal
and were dying to fight war. In other words, India
created Communism in Nepal.
They also were supported by the Indian Communist leaders and other Naxalite
group who are fighting against the Indian government for communism.
Surprisingly India never
helped Nepal government in
arresting those leaders and extraditing them in Nepal. When Nepali Maoists met
Nepali Communist leaders in Lucknow, India in 2003, India
government did not take initiative to arrest them, even though they were
recognized as terrorists by the United
States. Hence it is evident that India never wanted peace in Nepal. At the same time, international media was
busy defaming the King Gyanendra.
The interesting chemistry was all political parties
held discussions in India
with the Maoists in the Indian’s presence.
The irony was Maoists were able to kill Inspector General of Police of
the Royal Nepalese Government, but were not able to kill any leaders. This does not digest well. These Maoists and leaders were in agreement
not to kill each others leaders. Although
India
was successful in proving why they did not endorse “Zone of Peace”, they were
unable to offer prayers to King. Then India
played the worst game with the help of its own citizens—Koiralas, and Maoists
to end the Nepalese monarchy—which the world today knows as the Nepal’s Royal
Massacre.
After the Royal Massacre, many speculations were in
the air. However, immediately after the
incident, media, which are funded by India, started to air against
Gyanendra, who was the only heir left to the throne. India’s, Koirala’s and Maoists’
strategy was to defame monarchy and most importantly, the monarch who was
unknown to the world. India knew that
King Birendra was most popular and if the blame could be dumped on Gyanendra,
it would be the easiest way to uproot monarchy.
And so was the story we witnessed.
India
had a sound plan to kill the Royal Family so that no one else would remain
alive to keep the monarchy breathing.
However, the massacre happened when King Gyanendra was out of town and
allegedly was on the way back to the massacre site for the dinner. Gyanendra was crowned again as the King of
Nepal, and India,
once again, could not prove to be a successful director. India funded media were airing
speculations about King Gyanendra. The
love and respect for the King was then seen by the shaved head of all the
Nepalese—who respected Nepalese Monarch as their father. Noticeably, the present Prime Minster, Girija
Prasad, the same Indian Citizen, was the Prime Minister of Nepal during the
Royal Massacre. He helped India
facilitate the killings. Later, he also
facilitated King Gyanendra, to be removed from the palace. In other words, the Koiralas were well aware
of the killings, but instead of stopping India to kill the royals, the old
traitor helped them successfully execute the plan.
The King wanted the then prime minister Sher Bahadur
Deuba to hold the elections but even after he was granted to extend the date of
election twice, he was never motivated to hold the election. The underlying
political reason was that he continuously wanted to be in his office by
postponing the election. As a Chief of State, King Gyanendra could not wait to
see his country devastated. This made him to sack the cabinet and impose his
direct rule. Subsequently, in October 2002, King Gyanendra dismissed the prime
minister and his cabinet. While stopping
short of reestablishing parliament, the king in June 2004 reinstated the most
recently elected prime minister who formed a four-party coalition government. The
King, citing dissatisfaction with the government, dissolved the government in
2005, declared a state of emergency, imprisoned party leaders, and assumed
power. The king's government subsequently released party leaders and officially
ended the state of emergency in May 2005, but the monarch retained absolute
power until April 2006.
When King Gyanendra ascended throne in 2002, Nepal has been
going through civil war from the past ten years. Politicians of Nepal, as an
easy excuse to take benefit from inexperienced King imposed blame on him. When
King sacked the parliament for its inability to hold elections, the law was
enforced, the administration was healthy and the environment was getting
conducive. He acted tough on the people to enforce laws. The 12 years of
democracy by then had made Nepalese lazy and incompetent, but the king wanted
to abolish the ongoing crisis. While most of Nepalese were pleased to see this
progress, the corrupted people were unemployed. The leaders of Nepal are
barely educated to find a job, if they do not engage themselves into politics.
The government employees who never showed up on time were forced to be in the
office and corruption was strictly made illegal. How can idle Nepalese like
that? Obviously it will make them revolt. These led the politicians ally
together and form a coalition to fight against the King. Nepal and
Indian media supported well these coalition leaders. Countable 10-15 people
gathered for to restore democracy and started protest. It was not until April
2006, when Maoists joined the movement to fight against king. Truckload Maoists
entered the capital city to revolt. As a way to spread violence, Maoists
attacked on Maoists in the revolution process and charged King for their
deaths. After 30 people were killed, the King gave up all the powers and
reinstated the government. Hence, the King who wanted to make the country
progress was iconized as a dictator. Following that, if anyone in Nepal supports
nationalism, then they are labeled as royalists or a dictator.
Now that the monarchy is gone, common Nepalese who are
die hard fans of King, are looking for their God. However, Hinduism and Buddism have not taught
violence to Nepalese. Maybe that’s why
common Nepalese are not on the streets yet.
I remain unanswered, is Hinduism’s patience tested? Is Gurkhas’ blood tested? Are the Nepalese tested? Nepal has so far witnessed the Maoists crowd,
not the Nepali crowd, there will be a day when Gurkhalis will be on the streets
to show the bravery of Amar Singh Thapa, Bir Balbhadra Kunwar, Bhimsen Thapa,
or another Jung Bahadur Rana…and who knows, another Prithvi Narayan Shah to
Unify the breaking Nepal.
http://newsblaze.com/story/20080619175135tsop.nb/topstory.html
Last edited: 21-Jun-08 02:59 PM
|
|
|
|
rustymood
Please log in to subscribe to rustymood's postings.
Posted on 06-21-08 9:46
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
it is well written, and some of the things do have strong points like how come there is not much of leaders being killed by maoist where as there has been more than 3000 people killed which included top police and army and innocent teachers from all around the country. there might be some, but compared to other profession there has not been that much. some of the other stuff like indian hand in royal massacre, i dont think this has any base and does not make any logic. bottom line this discussion does not have any ending except for speculation.
|
|
|
santoshgiri
Please log in to subscribe to santoshgiri's postings.
Posted on 06-21-08 11:36
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
The following analysis and articles may shed light on the fact how International Intelligence has been targeting countries like Nepal. - Comparisons Between Recent U.S.-Backed Coups: Caracas and
Kathmandu-by Wayne Madsen at http://www.monthlyreview.org/0902madsen.htm - HIGHLIGHTS: On June 1st, 2001, King Birendra, his wife and all his children, were
assassinated. His younger brother, Gyanendra, was conveniently absent from the
from the palace at the time of the massacre of all those who were ahead of him
in succession to the throne. At first, Gyanendra and Prime Minister Girija
Koirala announced that the worst royal massacre since the assassination of the
Romanovs of Russia in 1917 had been caused by an automatic weapon that had gone
off by itself. Soon, the explanation for the massacre was changed to a story
befitting any Hollywood script. It was then announced that the King's oldest
son, Crown Prince Dipendra, had murdered his entire family and then shot
himself because his mother had forbidden him to marry a commoner. The new King
Gyanendra's only son, Paras, an unpopular brute, was at the palace during the
slaughter but managed to survive without so much as a scratch. Gyanendra
himself has long been a CIA and U.S. corporate stooge. For example, he has a
relationship with Henry Kissinger that goes back to the 1970s and the Ford
administration. On the other hand, King Birendra wanted to open peace
negotiations with the rebels and was also known to be a stauch anti-Indian
Nepali nationalist..
The CIA's Death Squad Body Count Continues to Pile Up- Wayne Madsen - AT - http://cryptome.org/bush-kills.htm
HIGHLIGHTS:
Today, a former U.S. intelligence asset, Dr. Jonas Savimbi, was killed by
Angolan Army units in eastern Angola. His is the sixth major assassination
of a political leader since Bush unleashed his CIA death squads. If one includes
the late Royal Family of Nepal and the late Congolese President Laurent Desire
Kabila (assassinated just 4 days before Bush was sworn in as President),
the number of those dispatched climbs even higher.
- http://www.sangam.org/PIRABAKARAN/Part36.htm : According to the BBC, the state Police
Intelligence Chief Kishore Jha, said the killing of Mr.Hrangkhawl was ‘a
major success’. Indian intelligence is now pressing Bhutan and Bangladesh
to arrest and extradite separatist refugees in those countries. The King
of Bhutan and Prime Minister of Bangladesh might want to look at what
happened to the entire Royal Family of Nepal last June when the late King
decided to negotiate with leftist guerrillas rather than fight them.
According to unblemished sources in
Kathmandu,
the king and his family were quickly dispatched by a Nepali army commando
unit trained at the time by US Special Operation forces sent by US Pacific
Commander in Chief Adm.Dennis Blair (he’s the same guy who propped up
Gen.Wiranto with special training while the good general was committing
genocide in East Timor). What was
to become the Pentagon’s Office of Strategic Influence (PSYOPs division)
prepared a story, with the assistance of India’s Research and Analysis
Wing (RAW) intelligence agency, that the King and his family were murdered
as a result of the Crown Prince going nuts with automatic weapons after
being forlorn over his mother’s refusal to allow him to marry a commoner.
The entire Western media bought that story faster than George Bush
nosediving after choking on a pretzel. The media also bought that one.â€
-
http://www.sangam.org/PIRABAKARAN/Part36.htm : Some may still naively believe the story
that Dipendra’s romance with Devyani Rana, a daughter from a noble family
in India, sealed the fate of Nepal’s King Birendra and his immediate
family as plausible. But, more convincing is the fact that there has been
‘bad blood’ between India and Nepal since Rajiv Gandhi’s prime ministerial
period, due to the ‘plumbing activities’ perpetrated by the muscle-flexing
intelligence operatives manned by the RAW agency. During the hearing of
the M.C.Jain Commission, which investigated the Rajiv assassination trial,
embarrassing evidence buttressing this fact was produced from an agent’s
report of RAW’s station reporting an unverified source that the then Queen
Aishwarya of Nepal had negotiated a ‘hit’ on Rajiv Gandhi through one
Major General Aditya Shamser Jang Bahadur for 10 crore Indian rupees!
[Source: India Today
magazine, Dec.1, 1997]. I should not be misunderstood. I’m not
advocating that Queen Aishwarya of Nepal was instrumental in Rajiv
Gandhi’s assassination, and that her assassination was a ‘return hit’
instigated by the Indian operatives. Rather, it is my contention that
Rajiv Gandhi assassination should not be viewed as an isolated killing of
a member of a prominent Indian family, but as a single damaged spoke of
South Asian wheel of political intrigue.
|
|
|
MadDoGG
Please log in to subscribe to MadDoGG's postings.
Posted on 06-21-08 11:41
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I second that rustymood............its all speculation. The death toll during the peoples war is around 16,000+ recorded.............thousands missing or unaccounted for. When it comes to what we all Nepalese actually want is PEACE AND PROSPERITY is it?????& what do all the leaders want ???answer; POWER and MONEY.........................HOW??? create instability, roits, death & destruction, false hope and spread HATE and more UNSECURITY so any one who is ruling or leading will fail. ALL these leaders will keep on obstructing each other, fighting and Indian asskissing to come to power through death and destruction and spreading hatred amongst Nepalese people.........................FOR WHAT REASON or GOAL????????...................to bring PEACE AND PROSPERITY in Nepal...............LOL what an IRONY........
|
|
|
ranii
Please log in to subscribe to ranii's postings.
Posted on 06-23-08 11:13
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
well summarized and concluded.
|
|
|
Pu-Ru
Please log in to subscribe to Pu-Ru's postings.
Posted on 06-24-08 9:32
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
well written. as some made comment here this is ture, those who try to speak for the sake of nepal is know an royalist these days.
its shame, and i think we'll see the result after couple of years since we've seen the good sing of so called political parties after the 1st CA meeting.
|
|
|
bisal123
Please log in to subscribe to bisal123's postings.
Posted on 06-24-08 9:43
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
.
Last edited: 24-Jun-08 09:44 PM
|
|
|
boozoo676
Please log in to subscribe to boozoo676's postings.
Posted on 07-02-08 10:09
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
this article has surely made my mind go into delima. i though that the politician and the moist were d heros of nepal but after going through d above article my whole opinioin has changed. king whom i though was d villan has appeared as hero and d heros have turned to villans. being a born of india i always took india as my second mother land but its now very painful to find that indian politican are doing and had been doing nothing good for my mother land Nepal.
so i dont know what will hapen to our new nepal and to make d matter worse now nepal is in d hands of neplalis who are puppets in d hands of india politician...
GOD bless NEPAL
|
|
|
sagrikasagar
Please log in to subscribe to sagrikasagar's postings.
Posted on 07-03-08 6:55
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|
|
no_tension
Please log in to subscribe to no_tension's postings.
Posted on 07-05-08 5:35
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Hello RiceOwls07, Who is behind not letting anybody investigate the royal massacre and imposing curfew while taking body of Dipendra to Aryaghat? What is the reason behind that from your perspective?
|
|
|
BihariBabu
Please log in to subscribe to BihariBabu's postings.
Posted on 07-10-08 10:56
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Does anything think the writer has written the truth? Have heard lots of for/against. How far is it true
Last edited: 11-Jul-08 08:57 PM
|
|
|
BihariBabu
Please log in to subscribe to BihariBabu's postings.
Posted on 07-11-08 8:59
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Does anything think the writer has written the truth? Have heard lots of for/against. How far is it true
|
|
|
guru91
Please log in to subscribe to guru91's postings.
Posted on 07-11-08 9:28
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
how can the writer blindly say that india and the koiralas were behind the killings?? does he have any f#cking proof? stupid ass article.
|
|
|
BihariBabu
Please log in to subscribe to BihariBabu's postings.
Posted on 07-12-08 12:08
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Why are Nepali after Indians? India is the becoming the most powerful country in the world. Nepal is not nothing for us. After all these Gurkha come and live in India. Many come just to find job and save their... if you don't like Indians, why don't you all Nepalese go out from India. We don't you all.
|
|
|
MadDoGG
Please log in to subscribe to MadDoGG's postings.
Posted on 07-12-08 12:27
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
LOL GIVE ME A BREAK....INDIA THE MOST POWERFUL COUNTRY IN THE WORLD?????? DAMN YOU GUYS INDIANS HAVE THIS FALSE PRIDE THAT MAKES YOU THE MOST HATED PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD..........FUGGIN LOOK AT THE SLUMS IN YOUR COUNTRY.....FIRST TREAT YOUR POVERTY LEVEL AND THEN COMPARE...........if it wasnt that Nepali politics have been ruined by your RAW Nepal would have been far more rich and powerfull than India. anyways what pride do you talk about?? all those railroads, ports, airfields, famous land marks were built by the british goverment. you indians built the slums that surround the big indian cities like Mumbai, Calcutta etc. FIRST CLEAN YOUR INTERNAL PROBLEM AND POVERTY THAN START THE WORLD DOMINATION DREAMS LOL.................Hey I agree with you in one point...send all the nepalese home and tell all the fuggin DHOTIS TO LEAVE NEPAL ALONE AND NEPALI POLITICS.....and in a few yrs .....Nepal will be one of the richest and powerful Asisn country......BECAUSE CHINA IS RIGHT THERE TO DO BUSINESS WITH US ......and India is INTRUDING OUR DEALS THROUGH THOSE RAW POLITICAL preassure on our good for nothing political leaders. BIHARI BABU DONT PLAY WITH NEPALI ANGER.........................IT WILL DESTROY YOU...JUST A WARNING
|
|
|
BihariBabu
Please log in to subscribe to BihariBabu's postings.
Posted on 07-12-08 12:39
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Maddog-there are no Indians in Nepal. Those are your own citizens and probably more Nepalis than your current political leaders. Our citizen like Girja babu is ruling your Nepal. He was born the same place this proud Bihari was born. Your ethnic problem is your problem within your border. India doesn't have to care about it. Your leaders are always leaned to India so that they can get benefit from India. After all they will come to India when their a_s is kicked.
|
|
|
MadDoGG
Please log in to subscribe to MadDoGG's postings.
Posted on 07-12-08 12:49
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
LOL BIHARIBABU...WAKEUP..........SON........TIMES ARE CHANGING AND AND YOUR INDIAN PRIDE...LMAO...........TELL ME WHY ARE INDIANS THE MOST HATED PEOPLE IN THE WORLD??? WHY??? AND YOU KNOW THAT BIHARI PEOPLE ARE EQUALLY DISCRIMINATED IN INDIA AS WELL.....LOL BHAIYAS THEY CALL THEM....FRUITSELLERS, PAAN DOKANS, ALL FREAKIN LOW STANDARDS ARE DONE BY BIHARI AND ALSO THE MOST CORRUPT AND CRIME RIDDEN PART OF INDIA..............WAKEUP BRO......BIHAR IS A SHAME OF INDIA.............DONT PLAY WITH FIRE IT WIL BURN YOU
|
|
|
BihariBabu
Please log in to subscribe to BihariBabu's postings.
Posted on 07-12-08 1:34
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Bihar is not shame. It is because of us Biharis India is advanced. The first president of India was from Bihar too. We Biharis did all sacrifices to make India whatever is today. Not those south indians who come here with fake certficiates. you Nepalis go and work for these garbages of India and what pride are you talking about
|
|
|
MadDoGG
Please log in to subscribe to MadDoGG's postings.
Posted on 07-12-08 1:46
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
COME TO NEPAL AND SEE FOR YOUR SELF WHO COLLECTS ALL THE GARBAGE.....KHALI SHISI PURANO KAGAJ, CHANA CHATPAT, AE HUJUR SABJI AALO GOBI MATTAR, LOL ALL THOSE ARE BIHARIS SELLING STREET VENDORS AND WALKING FRUIT AND VEGETABLE SERVICE.......I THANK YOU FOR THE SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE BIHARIS IN NEPAL. AS FOR YOUR CLAIM THAT BIHAR IS THE REASON FOR INDIAS DEVELOPEMENT........YOU ARE WRONG......IT WAS THE BRITISH INVASION AND YEARS OF BRITISH RAPING YOUR BUTT.......LOL........AS FOR US BRITISH COULD NEVER DEFEAT US IN BATTLE.........THEY KNEW INSTANTLY THAT WE ARENT TO MESS WITH.......SO THE SOONER INDIA REALIZE THAT THE BETTER.....................AND YES YOU STILL HAVENT TOLD ME WHY ARE INDIANS HATED ALL OVER THE WORLD?????
|
|
|
BihariBabu
Please log in to subscribe to BihariBabu's postings.
Posted on 07-12-08 2:24
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
What is world for you? Where have you been in your life? You know a lot about India. I think you have been to India and US (since most users from here) only.
|
|
|
MadDoGG
Please log in to subscribe to MadDoGG's postings.
Posted on 07-12-08 2:56
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I keep my friends close and my enemies even closer..................I know a lot about India........what do you know about Nepal????? The world means a lot for me because nepalese people are loved around the world for our nice humble character, where as you indians have this self given pride that it almost shouta out of every indian I meet that they are the best and know everything. STUPID AHOLES.....always bargaining for deals, cheap shoppers, never change, that horrifying accent, that smell of curry and insense stick when an indian passes by....YUKH....that tika on the forehead with a suit on what a terible sense of fashion. And always living the life style dictated by bollywood........THAT FAKE PRIDE YOU CARRY STINKS ALL AROUND THE WORLD.....i have yet to meet anyone who likes indians....I know some indians who hates indians LOL. Yes i am in the states........and millions around the world are Nepalese who share this hate towards India.......INDIANS ARE SO FULL OF IT
|
|